Tuesday, February 24, 2015

Week 7: Technology and the law


Throughout this semester the central theme of my blog has been assistive technology. With that being said, I know how to use, implement and make changes to these devices; so this weeks readings were very interesting for me. They were interesting because I never realized how many laws there were for providing assistive technology to students with disabilities.  The fact that there are several laws just reinforces the notion that assistive technology is extremely important in the classroom.

Both sites provided a summation of the legislation behind the funding associated with assistive technology. A few pieces of legislation caught my eye. The “Tech Act” of 1988 provided federal funds to states to develop training and delivery systems for assistive technology devices and services. It required states and territories to develop statewide, consumer-responsive programs of technology-related services for individuals with disabilities of all ages. Moreover, this was the first act of its kind to insure funding. This act was further strengthened by the implementation of Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA) in 1990 and 1997.

These acts are essential to individuals who suffer from impairments that require assistive technology but also staff that works with these individuals. I have several students who have very expensive DynaVox devices that help them in their day-to-day communication. I strongly believe, without these pieces of legislation their families wouldn’t be able to pay for them. Our classroom assistive technology specialist often calls the justification process for these AAC devices “creative writing.” I talked to her about the process and says that she can have a justification sent be 2 or 3 times until it’s approved. Nevertheless, students will still benefit from the device no matter how many times the justification needs to be written.

2 comments:

  1. It absolutely amazes me that it may take two or three times in order to get the approval for assistive technology for a student. It is amazing to know that there are dedicated professional who are willing to fight at no cost to get these devices for students. I agree these devices provide students with life changing technology. As technology continues to integrate into the classroom, I hope that more of these devices become accessible and that it wouldn't be such a battle to get these devices. I understand that they are expensive but the same could be said about Smart Boards and classroom laptop sets.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Dale,
    The legislative side of the process is interesting. It is a shame that as educators we have to jump through hoops and it is still difficult to get the technology you need. I have had similar experiences where the justification process needs a very creative touch and what works one time may not work another. It certainly is disheartening when you know that getting that piece of technology may significantly help that student achieve their goals.

    ReplyDelete